Within 24 hours, the Simons Foundation team had put together the event, hosting 13 experimentalist-theorist pairs. (Because of time constraints, only the first 15 from each group were invited to participate.) Each indicated the type of relationship they were seeking, from the scientific equivalent of a brief affair — “just give me your data” — to those ready to commit to a “long-term, back-and-forth theory/experiment relationship.” Participants certainly had a lot to talk about — at the end of each round, most were reluctant to move on to the next candidate.
Michael Kohl, an experimentalist at the University of Oxford, made a number of connections even before getting his post-hoc matches.
Then you put all of that together into a computer and group people together based on similar knowledge bases (see figure 2).
You can also build a network of which of your participants have worked together in the past (see figure 3).
“The wicked, through the pride of his proud countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts.
His ways are always grievous; thy judgements are far above out of his sight: as for all his enemies, he puffeth at them.” The subject of scientific dating has to do with scientific methods used to try to figure out how old the Earth is.
The majority of users are college educated professionals.
Read Detailed Review » Rating: (4 out of 5) Rank: #5 Company: Perfect Match # of Members: Over 4 Million Type of Members: Serious Relationship Seekers Membership Options: Free & Paid Membership Benefits Cost: .83 to .95 /month Description: Perfect Match is one of the best approaches for adults seeking successful, lasting relationships.
It is not often that the general public has opportunity to informally chat with scientists, engineers, and social scientists; nor is it often that scientists, engineers, and social scientists get the opportunity to discuss their work with the general public in a social environment.How do you help your scientists make useful new connections and learn about potentially helpful new techniques? It’s much more fun to collect data on all of your conference delegates and use scientific clustering methods and network building algorithms to pair up the scientists in attendance based on their keenest interests. Who works with what (‘known methods’, see figure 1)?So, with much credit in particular to Federico Vaggi (a member of the Csikász-Nagy lab) and his prodigious last minute programming skills, that is what they did. And, who would like to work with what in the future (‘wanted methods’)?NISE Network products are developed through an iterative collaborative process that includes scientific review, peer review, and visitor evaluation in accordance with an inclusive audiences approach.Products are designed to be easily edited and adapted for different audiences under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license.